Play Poker
Forums
Weekly Games
Online Poker
FAQ's
Types of Poker
Hand Rankings
Top 10
Poker Glossary
WSOP
Links
Contact Us
Poker Affiliates
Real Estate
play online poker
    

 

 

 

 

    

    

 

 

Eating the Guppies

RockfordPoker.com

     There is one thing that is certain in this crazy world of Online Poker…………The sharks are always going to win the battle against the fish in the long run.  Typically I don’t share my online poker theories and secrets in my articles, but what the heck it’s been a great couple of months.  People often ask me how I can consistently do so well in the $10 -$20 games online.  Well it’s actually quite simple.  Like anyone else I have my swings, but at the end of the month when I am looking at my scorecard I am never down.

     In the beginning I was forced to learn the hard way about money management.  I would come home after a night out with the guys, log onto PartyPoker (always PartyPoker) and decide I was the best damn player in the world.  I would take my last $300 in the account and hit the $10 - $20 game with vengeance.  Well that seldom panned out, typically I would go broke.  Sure I had my swings where I could turn that $300 into $1500 but usually it was just out the window.

     That is what is considered playing recklessly!  If you can spot reckless players like I was, it is easy to take all their money, in other words Eat the Guppies!! Almost all of the success I have had in the last year playing online has come from using this method and theory.

     Here’s how it works.  And just because I play 10 - 20 doesn’t mean you can’t apply this principal to the lower limits.  My available bankroll is ALWAYS over $10K when I play at these limits.  First thing is that you need to have accounts at more than just one poker room.  If not your really limiting yourself to finding the weakest players at any given time.  I look for 5 handed 10 – 20 tables that are full and everyone at the table has less than $300.  Of course you have to look around but they are there every night somewhere.  These players are sitting there just hoping to get lucky.  Obviously they are not pro’s unless they wouldn’t be in a 10 -20 with $300.

     Having 100 times more bankroll at my disposal, it is almost certain that if I play solid I am going to be able to crack at least half the players at the table.  These players are a goldmine.  You can get away with check-raises, slow plays, calling to the river, and all kinds of things that won’t fly in a game with big bankrolls.  Why in the world would you want to sit in a cash game and have a bankroll 100 times less than your opponent?

     Likewise why would I want to sit at a 10 – 20 with a bunch of players who all have $3K+ in front of them.  Right there tells me that most of them are obviously somewhat experienced to be sitting with that kind of bankroll. 

     Like I said before, you can apply this principal even in the micro-limits.  Too many people just sit down at the first available table to open up.  The best time to find the guppies is between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 3:00 A.M because you often will stumble upon the drunks who have no regard for their game and are looking for that quick rush.  

     The other thing that made a noticeable difference in my online profits was when I began playing at 2-2 different sites.  This way you can be selective and wait for the right table to open up.  This is just me but I have found that PokerStars WILL force you to play you’re “A” game and make you a better player, but if you’re looking to go fishing the best sites are PartyPoker and Pokerroom.

     Hopefully this can help some of you young aspiring online players to increase your profits at the tables and give you a new strategy to work with.  I always look forward to your comments or questions about my articles.

 

Jeremy Enke

(Jeremy Enke has been playing online poker semi-professionally for three years and writes for RockfordPoker.com as well as owning the largest poker affiliate forum in the world at PokerAffiliateWorld.com)

 

 

You are theHit Counter member to read this article